More good news from Ruy Teixeira, whose analyses of the poll tea leaves are proving to be must-reads. On his terrifc blog, Donkey Rising, Ruy emphasizes Clark's strength with men and independents relative to the other Dems. ". . . Evidence continues to mount that Clark could definitely beat Bush and is probably the Democrats’ best bet to do so."
We’ve already seen that Clark does very well among Democratic registered voters who are men. But he also does well among male registered voters in general. In a just-released Quinnipiac University poll of Pennsylvania voters, Clark is the only candidate who holds Bush under 50 percent (48 percent Bush to 43 percent Clark) in a prospective 2004 matchup. He does this by getting as much support as Dean among women (44 percent), but also receiving 42 percent support from men, in contrast to Dean’s 37 percent. As a result Dean runs much less well than Clark, losing to Bush 51 percent to 41 percent.. . . Too bad there’s that pesky nomination business. . . .
Well, that's sort of up to us, isn't it?

For instance, his Silver Star citation:
"As the friendly force maneuvered through the treacherous region, it was suddenly subjected to an intense small arms fire from a well-concealed insurgent element. Although painfully wounded in the initial volley, Captain Clark immediately directed his men on a counter-assault of the enemy positions. With complete disregard for his personal safety, Captain Clark remained with his unit until the reactionary force arrived and the situation was well in hand. His courageous initiative and exemplary professionalism significantly contributed to the successful outcome of the engagement. Captain Clark's unquestionable valor in close combat against a hostile force is in keeping with the finest traditions of the military service and reflects great credit upon himself, the 1st Infantry Division, and the United States Army."
Who knew he needs glasses?